Plans to put up agricultural workers in former Bognor care home refused

Plans to house temporary agricultural workers in a former Bognor Regis care facility have been turned down.
Royal Bay Residential Care Home in Aldwick Road closed last yearRoyal Bay Residential Care Home in Aldwick Road closed last year
Royal Bay Residential Care Home in Aldwick Road closed last year

The Royal Bay Residential Home in Aldwick Road was closed by regulators in March 2019 due to serious safeguarding concerns.

Pro-Force, a recruitment company specialising in providing workers to food, agricultural and horticultural businesses, then applied to Arun District Council for a temporary change of use for the building.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Late last week its application to use Royal Bay to house 80 seasonal agricultural workers for a period of 12 months, was rejected.

According to council planning officers there are ten properties already registered as HMOs (house of multiple occupation) in the vicinity of the site, supporting around 58 people in total.

They felt the 80 workers and two live-in staff would result in a ‘substantial increase of population in an already densely populated area’.

Their report also suggests the proposed use was ‘incomparable’ to its former use as a care home and was ‘materially different’.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Problems with on-street parking in the surrounding road network were already described as ‘severe’, with the development expected to add to these pressures.

Proposals detailed how workers would be accommodated in a combination of single and double rooms, together with larger rooms for three to four occupants, with shared shower facilities and self-catering kitchen facilities.

Indoor facilities, which include a large lounge area with pool table/football table, would remain closed during Covid-19 restrictions.

Since the plans featured only a small area of private amenity space in front of the property, officers felt this ‘would not provide a secluded, quiet and tranquil area which the character of private amenity space should provide’.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

They added: “The development seeks for approximately 82 persons to occupy the building whilst providing little to no usable amenity space of private value.”

Officers also considered the level of activity associated with the amount and intensity of development, combined with the site’s proximity to nearby residential properties, would result in an adverse level of harm that is both ‘significant and demonstrable’.

A message from the Editor, Gary Shipton:

In order for us to continue to provide high quality and trusted local news, I am asking you to please purchase a copy of our newspapers.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our local valued advertisers - and consequently the advertising that we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you helping us to provide you with news and information by buying a copy of our newspapers.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Our journalists are highly trained and our content is independently regulated by IPSO to some of the most rigorous standards in the world. But being your eyes and ears comes at a price. So we need your support more than ever to buy our newspapers during this crisis.

Stay safe, and best wishes.