Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Eco town looms nearer for Ford



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

A FURTHER 5,000 homes could be forced on Arun after Ford was shortlisted as a possible location for an eco-town last week.
The Department of Communities and Local Government announced 15 locations, last Thursday, which will now go through the next stage of consultation.
The news was greeted by a mixture of dismay and support.
Two proposals, one from the Ford Enterprise Hub and the other from the Ford Airfield Vision Group for the former Ford Airfield site, have been submitted.

Eco-town numbers, when added to possible numbers for the South East Plan could mean more than 16,000 new homes for Arun District.

Local MPs Nick Herbert and Nick Gibb have vowed to continue the fight against an eco-town at Ford following the Government's announcement.

Mr Herbert, Arundel and South Downs MP, said: "This is a new town in disguise. There's nothing 'eco' about building 5,000 houses on a green field site. We simply don't have the infrastructure to support additional housing on this scale."


For full story and reaction see West Sussex Gazette April 9

The full article contains 188 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 April 2008 10:25 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Chichester
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.